How NY Engineers Helped a K-12 School Build a Roadmap for 91.04% Potential Energy Reduction in Just Two Weeks

INDUSTRY

Education

BUILDING

2-Story Public School

FACILITY SIZE

181,000 sq. ft.

PROJECT TYPE

Retrofit Assessment

TIMELINE

2 Weeks

KEY OUTCOME

91.04% Energy Reduction

Project Overview

A 181,000 sq. ft. public school was preparing for long-term improvements to its facility. Before investing in new equipment or infrastructure, the client needed to understand how the building was performing and where meaningful energy savings could be achieved.

The assessment extended across HVAC systems, domestic hot water, lighting, building controls, the building envelope, and renewable energy opportunities. The client also needed recommendations supported by a calibrated energy model that could provide a reliable basis for future capital investments.

The goal was not simply to identify individual upgrades. It was to understand how the building performed as a whole and develop a practical roadmap for prioritizing future improvements.

The Challenge

The project required NY Engineers to:

  • Establish a reliable baseline of the building's existing energy performance.
  • Evaluate multiple building systems and how they influenced overall energy use.
  • Identify and quantify practical Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs).
  • Determine which improvements would deliver the greatest impact.
  • Evaluate projected energy, operating cost, and greenhouse gas impacts.
  • Develop a phased roadmap that could guide future capital investments.

The recommendations needed to be supported by a calibrated energy model so that future investment decisions could be based on measured building performance rather than assumptions.

Energy Modelling Approach

Establishing a Reliable Building Performance Baseline

Before evaluating potential upgrades, the building's existing energy performance needed to be established.

An ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit was conducted alongside a calibrated eQUEST DOE-2.2 energy model to represent the building's existing operating conditions. This created a reliable baseline for evaluating potential Energy Conservation Measures against the building's actual performance.

Evaluating the Building as an Integrated System

The assessment covered HVAC systems, domestic hot water, lighting, building controls, the building envelope, and Solar PV feasibility.

Rather than evaluating each system in isolation, their contribution to overall building energy use was considered together. This helped identify where improvements could deliver the greatest potential impact while accounting for how the systems interacted within the building.

Testing Potential Improvements Through Energy Modeling

With the baseline established, multiple Energy Conservation Measure (ECM) scenarios were evaluated using the calibrated energy model.

Each recommendation was assessed for its projected impact on energy consumption, operating costs, greenhouse gas emissions, and long-term building performance. This provided a consistent basis for comparing different improvement strategies before implementation.

Project Outcomes
  • 47.82% VRF Energy Savings: The recommended Variable Refrigerant Flow system delivered the highest projected standalone reduction in energy consumption.
  • 91.04% Total Potential Energy Reduction: The broader electrification package demonstrated significant potential for reducing overall building energy consumption.
  • 2-Week Completion + 1 NYSERDA Revision: The ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit and calibrated energy model were completed within the required two-week schedule, with NYSERDA approval after only one revision.
  • Phased Retrofit Roadmap: Energy Conservation Measures were prioritized based on projected savings, operational impact, and long-term building performance.

Project Journey

The process moved from understanding existing building performance to testing potential improvements and ultimately organizing the recommendations into a practical implementation roadmap.

01

Existing Building Evaluation

02

ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit

03

Calibrated eQUEST DOE-2.2 Energy Model

04

Engineering Analysis of ECMs

05

Phased Energy Retrofit Roadmap

Why NY Engineers?

We establish the baseline before recommending upgrades.

Energy improvements are easier to prioritize when the existing building performance is understood first. This project began with an ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit and a calibrated energy model rather than assumptions about where savings would come from.

We Evaluate Systems Together

Building performance does not depend on one system alone. By evaluating HVAC, domestic hot water, lighting, controls, the building envelope, and renewable energy opportunities together, the assessment could identify how different improvements contributed to overall performance.

We Use Analysis to Prioritize Investment

Not every energy improvement delivers the same impact. Calibrated modeling allowed the potential performance of different ECMs to be compared before implementation, helping the client focus on the measures with the greatest projected value.

We turn engineering analysis into a roadmap.

The value of an energy audit is not simply identifying opportunities. It is giving the client a practical basis for deciding what to do, what to prioritize, and how to approach future improvements.

Planning an energy audit or evaluating future building upgrades?

Effective energy retrofits begin with understanding how a building performs, where energy is being used, and which improvements can deliver the greatest impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit?

An ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit is a detailed engineering assessment that evaluates a building's energy performance and identifies practical Energy Conservation Measures supported by technical and financial analysis.

Why is calibrated energy modeling important?

Calibrated energy modeling creates an accurate representation of existing building performance, allowing organizations to evaluate the projected impact of recommended energy upgrades before implementation.

What systems were evaluated during this project?

The study assessed HVAC systems, domestic hot water, lighting, building controls, the building envelope, solar PV feasibility, and electrification opportunities.

What were the primary engineering recommendations?

Recommendations included installing a high-efficiency VRF system, replacing existing boilers with condensing hot water boilers, upgrading lighting to LED with occupancy and daylight controls, optimizing the Building Management System, evaluating Solar PV feasibility, and pursuing electrification opportunities.

How quickly was the project completed?

The ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit and calibrated energy model were completed within two weeks and achieved NYSERDA approval with only one revision.